Speak Softer, Climb Faster: The Hidden Cost Desi Professionals Pay to Belong at Work
Priya had been at the consulting firm for three years before her manager pulled her aside after a client call. The feedback wasn't about her analysis — which was, by every measurable standard, sharper than anyone else in the room. It was about her presence. "They said I needed to work on my communication style," she recalls, laughing in that way people do when something stops being funny after the hundredth time. "What they meant was: sound less like you're from somewhere else."
This is the accent tax. It's not on any official invoice. Nobody puts it in your offer letter. But if you're a South Asian professional navigating corporate America, you've almost certainly paid it — in hours of deliberate speech modification, in the mental overhead of monitoring every sentence before it leaves your mouth, in the slow, grinding exhaustion of performing a version of yourself that's just palatable enough to get a seat at the table.
The Performance Nobody Talks About
Code-switching — the practice of adjusting language, tone, and behavior depending on social context — isn't unique to Desi professionals. Black Americans have written extensively and painfully about it. Latinx communities know it intimately. But for South Asians in particular, the conversation has been unusually quiet, tucked away behind a cultural tendency to absorb difficulty and keep moving.
Rohan, a senior product manager at a major tech company in the Bay Area, grew up in Hyderabad and moved to the US for grad school. He spent his first two years in the workforce actively watching YouTube videos of American news anchors — not for the content, but to study the rhythm of how they talked. "I told myself it was professional development," he says. "But honestly, I was trying to disappear a little bit. Make it easier for people to hear what I was saying instead of how I was saying it."
This distinction — what versus how — is at the heart of what makes the accent tax so insidious. The content of Rohan's ideas didn't change. His competence didn't change. What changed was the packaging, because the packaging was what was being evaluated.
HR Knows, and HR Isn't Saying Much
Talk to enough HR professionals off the record and a pattern emerges. Accent bias in performance reviews is real, it's documented, and it is almost never addressed directly. A 2022 study published in the Journal of Applied Psychology found that workers with non-native accents were rated as less competent and less leadership-ready by evaluators — even when the content of their speech was identical to native English speakers. The evaluators, for the most part, had no idea they were doing it.
"The challenge is that accent bias hides behind softer language," says one HR director at a Fortune 500 company who asked to remain anonymous. "Nobody says 'your accent is holding you back.' They say 'executive presence' or 'communication clarity.' It's coded, and it's almost impossible to challenge without sounding defensive."
For Desi professionals, those code words can feel like a wall with no door. Executive presence, in practice, often means proximity to a very specific kind of white, Western professional archetype — one that carries its own accent, its own cadence, its own cultural references, and doesn't even notice any of it as such.
The Psychological Tab
What does it cost to do this every single day? Psychologists have a term for the cumulative stress of managing identity across social contexts: minority stress. And while research on South Asian Americans specifically is still catching up, the broader data on code-switching paints a heavy picture. Studies link sustained identity masking to higher rates of burnout, anxiety, and a diminished sense of authentic self-worth.
Anjali, a therapist in Chicago who works primarily with South Asian clients, says she hears versions of the same story constantly. "People come in completely depleted and they can't always name why. When we dig in, a lot of it is this ongoing performance — this sense that who they actually are isn't quite acceptable in professional spaces. That's exhausting in a way that sleep doesn't fix."
There's also the particular grief of success built on self-suppression. Several executives Banthoda spoke with described reaching a level of seniority they'd worked toward for years, only to feel strangely hollow about it — because the version of themselves that got there wasn't entirely the real one.
Are Workplaces Actually Changing?
Here's where things get complicated, because the answer is: kind of, unevenly, and not fast enough.
The post-2020 corporate reckoning with diversity pushed many companies to finally say the quiet parts out loud. DEI initiatives proliferated. "Bring your whole self to work" became a workplace mantra. And for some Desi professionals, particularly those in more progressive tech and media environments, there has been a genuine, if incremental, shift.
Meera, a director at a media company in New York, says the difference in the last five years has been real but fragile. "There's more openness now. I don't modulate as much as I used to. But it's still contextual — it depends on who's in the room, what the stakes are, whether I can afford to be fully myself that day." That phrase — whether I can afford to be — lands with particular weight.
For others, especially those in more traditional industries like finance, law, and manufacturing, the pressure to assimilate remains essentially unchanged. The language around it has evolved; the expectation hasn't.
The Generation Coming Up Behind
What's different now is that younger Desi professionals — those who grew up in the US, who came of age watching Hasan Minhaj own a stage and Mindy Kaling rewrite what a leading lady looks like — are increasingly unwilling to pay the same tab their parents did.
"I'm not going to flatten myself for a job," says Vikram, 26, who recently turned down an offer at a firm where he felt the culture would require exactly that. "My parents did that. They had to. I don't think I have to, and I don't think I should."
This is not naivety. It's a generational recalibration of what the cost-benefit analysis of assimilation actually looks like — and whether the corner office is worth what you have to give up to get there.
What Would Actually Help
The fixes aren't complicated in theory, even if they're hard in practice. Structured interview and review processes that reduce room for subjective bias. Leadership that actively names accent bias instead of letting it hide behind euphemism. Mentorship pipelines that don't require cultural erasure as the price of entry.
And maybe, most importantly, a broader cultural willingness to recognize that "professional" has always been a costume — one that was designed to fit a very specific body and has been handed to everyone else with instructions to make it work.
Priya, for what it's worth, eventually left that consulting firm. She's at a different company now, one where, she says, her communication style hasn't come up once. "I don't know if I'm just lucky or if things are actually different," she admits. "But I can tell you — showing up as myself is the only way I could do this long-term. I wasn't built to maintain that performance forever."
None of us are.